Multiple sclerosis and the risk of infection: a consensus guideline

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory condition affecting the central nervous system. Infection is a major consideration in the MS population due to its relevance to several stages of the disease process:(i) it has been suggested that infective processes may be ‘triggering’ or aetiological factors for MS, (ii) concurrent infection is known to exacerbate symptoms in MS, (iii) people with MS are at higher risk of infection when compared to the general population, and this risk is exaggerated in those receiving disease modifying therapies (DMTs).This guidance document was developed by specialists in the field of MS, Immunology, Infectious Disease and Pharmacy. A modified Delphi approach was used to develop clinically relevant, evidence-based consensus guidelines to help physicians navigate the complex interaction between DMTs and infectious diseases.We focus on specific risks predisposing people with MS to infection and how to manage these risks. We also provide recommendations on how to screen for, prevent, and manage infection in this population, in particular tuberculosis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, hepatitis B, human papillomavirus, herpetic and other opportunistic infections. We also discuss vaccination and the COVID-19 pandemic in people on DMTs.

CT findings of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: a systematic review and individual patient data analysis.

PURPOSE: Common CT abnormalities of pulmonary aspergillosis represent a cavity with air-meniscus sign, nodule, mass, and consolidation having an angio-invasive pattern. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and an individual patient-level image analysis of CT findings of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting CT findings of CAPA as of January 7, 2021. We summarized study-level clinical and CT findings of CAPA and collected individual patient CT images by inviting corresponding authors. The CT findings were categorized into four groups: group 1, typical appearance of COVID-19; group 2, indeterminate appearance of COVID-19; group 3, atypical for COVID-19 without cavities; and group 4, atypical for COVID-19 with cavities. In group 2, cases had only minor discrepant findings including solid nodules, isolated airspace consolidation with negligible ground-glass opacities, centrilobular micronodules, bronchial abnormalities, and cavities. RESULTS: The literature search identified 89 patients from 25 studies, and we collected CT images from 35 CAPA patients (mean age 62.4 ± 14.6 years; 21 men): group 1, thirteen patients (37.1%); group 2, eight patients (22.9%); group 3, six patients (17.1%); and group 4, eight patients (22.9%). Eight of the 14 patients (57.1%) with an atypical appearance had bronchial abnormalities, whereas only one (7.1%) had an angio-invasive fungal pattern. In the study-level analysis, cavities were reported in 12 of 54 patients (22.2%). CONCLUSION: CAPA can frequently manifest as COVID-19 pneumonia without common CT abnormalities of pulmonary aspergillosis. If abnormalities exist on CT images, CAPA may frequently accompany bronchial abnormalities.

A Clinical Case of COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA), Illustrating the Challenges in Diagnosis (Despite Overwhelming Mycological Evidence).

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in large numbers of patients requiring critical care management. With the established association between severe respiratory virus infection and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (7.6% for COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA)), the pandemic places a significant number of patients at potential risk from secondary invasive fungal disease. We described a case of CAPA with substantial supporting mycological evidence, highlighting the need to employ strategic diagnostic algorithms and weighted definitions to improve the accuracy in diagnosing CAPA.

A National Strategy to Diagnose Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Invasive Fungal Disease in the Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Fungal coinfection is a recognized complication of respiratory virus infections, increasing morbidity and mortality, but can be readily treated if diagnosed early. An increasing number of small studies describing aspergillosis in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with severe respiratory distress are being reported, but comprehensive data are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, risk factors, and impact of invasive fungal disease in adult COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory distress. METHODS: An evaluation of a national, multicenter, prospective cohort evaluation of an enhanced testing strategy to diagnose invasive fungal disease in COVID-19 intensive care patients. Results were used to generate a mechanism to define aspergillosis in future COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-five adults (median age: 57, M/F: 2.2/1) were screened. The incidence was 26.7% (14.1% aspergillosis, 12.6% yeast infections). The overall mortality rate was 38%; 53% and 31% in patients with and without fungal disease, respectively (P = .0387). The mortality rate was reduced by the use of antifungal therapy (mortality: 38.5% in patients receiving therapy vs 90% in patients not receiving therapy (P = .008). The use of corticosteroids (P = .007) and history of chronic respiratory disease (P = .05) increased the likelihood of aspergillosis. CONCLUSIONS: Fungal disease occurs frequently in critically ill, mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. The survival benefit observed in patients receiving antifungal therapy implies that the proposed diagnostic and defining criteria are appropriate. Screening using a strategic diagnostic approach and antifungal prophylaxis of patients with risk factors will likely enhance the management of COVID-19 patients.

Evaluation of the Performance of the Associates of Cape Cod STAT Assay for the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Disease in Critical-Care Patients with COVID-19.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been increasing reports of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in critical care, where rapid access to (1-3)-ß-d-glucan (BDG) testing may have enhanced diagnosis. The potential benefit of rapidly accessible BDG results is limited by local availability of BDG testing, with low demand resulting in testing being performed in specialist centers. The recent release of the Associates of Cape Cod STAT assay provides a simple, low-throughput BDG platform, potentially increasing accessibility. During the pandemic, BDG testing using the Fungitell assay (FA) was a critical component of screening for IFD in our critical care. The performance of the STAT was retrospectively determined through a case-control study of 107 serum samples from critical-care COVID-19 patients with IFD defined according to international guidelines. The STAT demonstrated excellent qualitative (observed agreement, 97.2%; kappa, 0.94) and quantitative (Spearman's coefficient, 0.8962) agreement with the FA. Sample positivity was greater (P < 0.0001) in samples from cases (67.7%) versus controls (6.1%). Using the manufacturer's threshold (≥1.2), sensitivity and specificity for the detection of proven/probable IFD were 67.9% and 93.9%, respectively. Using a lower positivity threshold of ≥0.87 increased sensitivity to 71.4% without compromising specificity. When the STAT BDG index was >2.86, specificity was 100%. The STAT provides a simple, comparable alternative to the FA for detecting BDG. Sensitivity is moderate, and specificity is excellent for the diagnosis of IFD in the critical-care COVID-19 patient. The potential for enhancing access to BDG testing through the uptake of STAT at centers where FA is not available is beneficial, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.